Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Young

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 2011No. 4-10-0776PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pope

Presiding Justice Knecht and Justice Turner concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

On September 8, 2010, the trial court granted defendant Jack Young’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Steven and Amber Garcia appeal, arguing the court erred in granting defendant’s motion because defendant owed plaintiff a duty to warn Steven Garcia about and protect him from dangerous conditions on defendant’s property. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In July 2007, the Garcias filed a two-count complaint against Young. In count I of the complaint, Steven sought damages for injuries he suffered after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. LaFever v. Kemlite Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sandoval v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Ralls v. Village of Glendale HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballog v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. Murray v. PoaniAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Davidson v. Menard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API