Garcia v. Young
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pope
Presiding Justice Knecht and Justice Turner concurred in the judgment and opinion.
OPINION
On September 8, 2010, the trial court granted defendant Jack Young’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs Steven and Amber Garcia appeal, arguing the court erred in granting defendant’s motion because defendant owed plaintiff a duty to warn Steven Garcia about and protect him from dangerous conditions on defendant’s property. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In July 2007, the Garcias filed a two-count complaint against Young. In count I of the complaint, Steven sought damages for injuries he suffered after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- LaFever v. Kemlite Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Sandoval v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Ralls v. Village of Glendale HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ballog v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Murray v. PoaniAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Davidson v. Menard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019