Legal Opinion

Cabin Branch Mining Co. v. Hutchinson's Administratrix

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 9, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Prince William county in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The defendant in error (who was the plaintiff below), brought this action to recover damages for the death of her intestate, Quinton Hutchinson, attributed to the negligence of the defendant, the Cabin Branch Mining Company.

On March 1, 1909, Hutchinson, in association with a fellow-workman, or “buddy,” was in the employment of the defendant, engaged in doing contract work with a drilling machine in level No. 16. On that day they were informed by Amos Stall, the pit boss, that he wanted them to work on the night shift, operating the drilling machine in level No. 19, instead of two other men,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell Creek Coal Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  2. Cook v. American Tubing & Webbing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1906
  3. Lynchburg Traction & Light Co. v. GuillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  4. Atlantic Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Union Trust & Title Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Keota v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Fields v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  3. American Locomotive Co. v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API