Legal Opinion
Harris v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul G. Feinman, J.
Plaintiff seeks an order declaring that the settlement reached in the above-captioned action pertains solely to past pain and suffering and that the New York City Department of Social Services (DSS) and/or the New York City Human Resources Administration are precluded from satisfying any liens from any settlement funds. The motion is granted only to the extent that the matter shall be set down for a hearing before this court to determine what portion of the settlement is deemed to be for pain and suffering and what amount is to be repaid to DSS, and is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cricchio v. PennisiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Calvanese v. CalvaneseNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Gold v. United Health Services Hospitals, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Lugo v. Beth Israel Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- D.J. v. 636 Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Homan v. County of Cattaraugus Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Fried v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2012