Legal Opinion

Coonan v. Baltimore & O. R.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1938No. 20320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

This is a motion for a new trial, following a verdict for defendant, in a suit by plaintiff to recover damages resulting to plaintiff when he was struck by a railroad train operated by defendant.

While the facts are not particularly germane to the decision of the points raised by motion for a new trial, I nevertheless recite them briefly as follows:

On May 1, 1936, the -plaintiff was walking on a roadway between two of the defendant’s railroad tracks, the roadway constituting the platform' of the defendant’s railway station at McKeesport, Pa.

According to the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Davies v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Hodder v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hussar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API