Coonan v. Baltimore & O. R.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
This is a motion for a new trial, following a verdict for defendant, in a suit by plaintiff to recover damages resulting to plaintiff when he was struck by a railroad train operated by defendant.
While the facts are not particularly germane to the decision of the points raised by motion for a new trial, I nevertheless recite them briefly as follows:
On May 1, 1936, the -plaintiff was walking on a roadway between two of the defendant’s railroad tracks, the roadway constituting the platform' of the defendant’s railway station at McKeesport, Pa.
According to the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Davies v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Hodder v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hussar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981