Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Muhlenberg College

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1910No. Appeal, No. 313PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Jan. T., 1909, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lehigh Co., April T., 1909, No. 62, on case stated in suit of Maria E. Arnold and Martha A. Myer v. Muhlenberg College. Case stated to determine title to real estate. Before Trexler, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was in entering judgment for plaintiff on case stated.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

February 21, 1910:

William Dorney died on March 22, 1881, leaving a will dated September 18, 1880. He left to survive him a widow and five children, four of whom were deaf-mutes. Subject to his widow’s life estate, and with the exception of a small be*323quest to the fifth child, Rebecca, to whom he had advanced a sum equal to her share, he distributed his estate among the four deaf-mutes. At the date of the will, Maria E. and Martha Ann (called Massy Ann in the will) were married and the former had one child, living. Subsequently a child was born to Martha which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guthrie's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  2. Lapsley v. LapsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  3. Hackney v. TracySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Graham v. AbbottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaffer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Mylin v. HurstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Kyner v. HockersmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Roth v. CohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Christy's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API