Legal Opinion

Blenman v. Herron

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs. The exception carved out for candidates in Matter of Pell v Coveney (37 NY2d 494) does not apply to objectors (see Matter of Thompson v Wallace, 45 NY2d 803, 804).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pell v. CoveneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. MATTER OF THOMPSON v. WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Krupczak v. ManciniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Riley v. Democratic PartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Augustine v. D'ApiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. In re the Village of Herkimer Republican PartyNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Visconti v. PainoNew York Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API