Rutland, Edwards & Co. v. Cooke
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in litigation involving a brokerage account the defendants have appealed.
In April, 1936, Paul E. Cooke and Olivette Cooke, his wife, commenced dealings with Rutland, Edwards & Co., a corporation, which was acting as a securities broker in the city of Los Angeles. After that date many different transactions were had. Among others on February 28, 1937, Mrs. Cooke ordered the plaintiff to purchase 200 shares of Richfield Oil, new. The certificate, under the directions of Mrs. Cooke, was made in the name of Mrs. Cooke and when received was, under the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kutz v. FleisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- A. L. Jameson & Co. v. RedfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- English v. ShipleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. BonziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Meherin v. MeherinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- McKinley v. LagaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.