In re Right
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission charges that the respondent, Paula Thrun Right, engaged in six counts of professional misconduct, five arising from her representation of clients and one arising out of a criminal conviction. The Commission and the respondent now have tendered for this Court’s approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline in resolution of this case. Our disciplinary jurisdiction is conferred by the respondent’s admission to this state’s bar on October 10,1973.1
The parties agree that the respondent engaged in misconduct and that…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of OliverIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of ColemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Matter of StultsIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of EddingfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
4Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of KightIndiana Supreme Court · 1997