Legal Opinion
Hiller v. Bd. of Educ. of Brunswick Cent. Sch. D.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided June 2, 1988No. 87-CV-1141PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, Chief Judge.
Background 1
Robert and Nancy Hiller commenced this action on behalf of their son, David, seeking relief under the Education of All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. section 1400, et seq. (“EAHCA”). The plaintiff is seeking declaratory relief compelling the defendant Board of Education of the Brunswick Central School District (“school district”); Thomas Sobol, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Education; and the New York State Department of Education (referred to collectively as “the State defendants”) to provide David with a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pamela Tucker and Michael Tucker, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Jonas Tucker v. Bay Shore Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Straube v. Florida Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Mavis v. SobolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994