Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

United States v. Vann

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2011No. 09-4298APublished

1Concurring in the judgmentWilkinson, Circuit Judge

The North Carolina indecent liberties statute is singularly broad and the Shepard-approved documents are singularly unedifying. For these reasons and in these narrow circumstances, I cannot find the three predicate crimes of violence necessary to support an Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) enhancement. Because I believe too many courts are too deep in the weeds on the matter of the ACCA’s residual clause, I reluctantly feel required to write separately.

I appreciate very much the conscientious attention of my colleagues to this case. The profusion of opinions here, however, illustrates the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API