Ailstock v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Appellant appeals from his conviction of simple battery.
1. The state, asserting that it expected appellant to “attempt to introduce testimony as to the character of the victim,” filed a motion in limine to exclude “any reference to the character of the victim of the crime absent [appellant’s] prima facie showing that the victim was assailing the [appellant] at the time the crime was committed.” (Emphasis supplied.) The state, in support of its motion, cited several cases for the “well settled principle of law that evidence regarding the character of a victim of a violent crime…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Doyal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Davidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Bogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.