Legal Opinion

In re Bank of Europe

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to intervene and oppose change of name by a bank.

1Opinion of the CourtDelehanty, J.

The “ Bank of Europe,” by order heretofore made herein, was permitted upon ex parte application to assume the name of “ Republic Bank of New York.” “ The Public National Bank of New York ” seeks to intervene herein for the purpose of opposing the change of name of the petitioner and asks a vacatur of the order granting same. It is contended in the first instance that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain the motion in these proceedings, as the provisions of the statute governing application by a banking institution for a change of its name (Gen. Corp. Law, §§ 60-63) make no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taendsticksfabriks Akticbolagat Vulcan v. MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Baldwin & Jaycox v. MayorNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  3. In re Abyssinian Baptist ChurchNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rochester Savings Bank v. Rochester Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. New York Trust Co. v. New York County Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In re Albany City Savings InstitutionNew York Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API