Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Whitley v. . Arenson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1941Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSeawell, J.

Civil action to restrain sale of land under execution.

A temporary restraining order was issued and continued to the final hearing, when the facts were agreed upon and the cause submitted to the court for determination thereon. In summary, they follow:

1. On 1 March, 1920, J. I. Efird and wife conveyed a tract of land in Stanly County, consisting of 8 3/4 acres, to "M. E. J. Kelly and her heirs by T. D. Kelly."

A printed form was used in the preparation of this deed. The blank spaces were filled out by the county surveyor. In the premises the grantee is designated "M. E. J. Kelly and her heirs…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Smith v. Proctor.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API