Legal Opinion

Davis v. Gulf Refining Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1947No. 36478PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bill was filed by Willie E. Davis, Jr., and his mother, wife of appellant, naming as defendants the Gulf Refining Company as mineral lessee, certain grantees of mineral interests, and, in anticipation of ultimate partition, the children and heirs of the owner and common title source, D.L. Davis. Appellant was also joined as a defendant, "if living." The purpose of the bill was to establish title in complainants to an undivided one-sixth interest in the lands in question, and cancellation of all instruments executed subsequent to the death of D.L. Davis insofar as they affect the undivided…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. SilerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Peeples v. BotkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Naylor & Jones v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Shelby v. RhodesMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Harvey v. BriggsMississippi Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Gaddis & McLaurin, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Quates v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hurst v. J. M. Griffin & Sons, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Walker v. EasterlingMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hurst v. J. M. Griffin & Sons, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API