Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Anable

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 16, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

In final analysis, the question here determinable is whether the accounting fiduciary should receive three separate commissions for handling the same property.

On February 16, 1925, the present testator, Richard Anable, erected a voluntary trust inter vivos with the United States Trust Company of New York as trustee. The terms of this instrument, as a whole are of no present materiality. Suffice it to note that certain stocks were transferred to the trustee and power was reserved by the settlor to increase the trust fund from time to time during his fife or by his will. At the time…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SmallmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  2. Crawford v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Tifft v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Collier v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StulmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of RubinsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  3. In re the Estate of TerwilligarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  4. In re the Estate of HurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of BakerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API