Legal Opinion

Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

North Carolina Business Court

Decided January 6, 2004No. 01-CVS-1264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Coker v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.,

2004 NCBC 1

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF ROWAN 01 CVS 1264 James and Charlotte Coker, ) Robert and Rebecca Darconte, ) and Donald and Bonita Shoe, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER AND OPINION ) v. ) ) DaimlerChrysler Corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) {1} This case arises out of plaintiffs’ claim of an alleged design defect in the brake systems in minivans manufactured by DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“Daimler”) and sold to consumers since 1995. Plaintiff class representatives brought this action against defendant on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Club Car, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2007
  2. Medfusion, Inc. v. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API