Legal Opinion

People v. Dawdy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 1, 1967No. Gen. No. 10,876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTrapp, J.

Upon a jury trial defendant was convicted of the offense of forgery of a bank check. An issue upon this appeal is whether or not the indictment was sufficient to state an offense.

In People v. Tilden, 242 Ill 536, 90 NE 218, it is stated that at common law an indictment must profess, on its face, to set out an exact copy of the forged instrument and that in the absence of a statute providing otherwise, an indictment which fails to do so is fatally defective. In People v. Brown, 397 Ill 92, 72 NE2d 859 (1947), the Supreme Court states the rule to be that an indictment for forgery must profess…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People v. CrouchIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. The People v. FurmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. StringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. People v. ProngerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  5. People v. TildenIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HaynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API