In the Interest of C. L.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
The juvenile court adjudicated C. L. delinquent after finding that he was guilty of acts, which if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal attempt to hijack a motor vehicle and aggravated assault. C. L. appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient and that the juvenile court should have granted his motion for a continuance. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
1. C. L. argues that the juvenile court erred in adjudicating him delinquent because there was insufficient evidence that he committed the acts charged in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kimbro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Millender v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Cummings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of M. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Interest of D. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Boggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Harrelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.