Legal Opinion

Tisdale v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 8, 2004No. 25789PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was convicted of entering a bank with intent to steal, armed robbery, grand larceny, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a crime. The trial judge vacated the grand larceny conviction and sentenced respondent to thirty years for armed robbery, thirty years concurrent, for entering a bank with intent to steal, and two years consecutive, for possession of a weapon during commission of a crime. The Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences. State v. Tisdale, 338 S.C. 607, 527 S.E.2d 389 (Ct.App.2000).

Respondent filed an application for post-conviction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Thrift v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Southerland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. TisdaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clinton Folkes v. Warden NelsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Gilchrist v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Tisdale v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API