Legal Opinion
Gold v. DCL INCORPORATED
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 29, 1973No. 72 Civ. 4193PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKEL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a lawyer and experienced investor, claims to have been misled by material omissions affecting certain stock purchases so that he lost money rather than winning, as he had hoped to do. In a now common kind of action, he sues for himself and his alleged class under §§ 10(b), 20, and 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j (b), 78t, and 78aa (1970), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b, issued thereunder.
The securities involved are the common shares of defendant DCL Incorporated, of which plaintiff bought 500 on February 10 (at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,929 Theodore B. Wessel v. L. M. Buhler and N. A. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Iit, An International Investment Trust v. Bernard CornfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- IIT v. CornfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anthony M. NATELLI and Joseph Scansaroli, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Ingenito v. Bermec Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.