Legal Opinion
United States v. Institute of Carpet Manufacturers of America, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
This is an application for the entry of a consent decree.
The complaint which was filed on January 28, 1941, charges the defendants with combination and conspiracy in restraint of trade and commerce in rugs and carpets among the several states of the United States in violation of the provisions of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, under the Act of Congress of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note, entitled “An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies.”
All of the defendants interposed answers by their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- White v. JoyceSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Callaway Mills Company and Callaway Mills, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Cabin Crafts, Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966