Legal Opinion

Village of East Rochester v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

The litigation in both of these actions arises from an endeavor to establish a municipally owned electric plant in the village of East Rochester. The plant would furnish power to the village for its own purposes, and for compensation would provide power to private customers within the village. In order to carry out such plan the village of East Rochester, through its board of trustees, has presented to the voters by means of a mandatory referendum a proposition as to the establishment of such a project by the village, and at the election a majority of voters approved such project. Unless…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Matter of Tierney v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. New York Central Railroad v. Middleport Gas & Electric Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. New York Central Railroad v. Middleport Gas & Electric Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1989
  2. O'Flynn v. Village of East RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API