Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Dedrick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Elliott, J., granting plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint and denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
“CANTY, J.
In the complaint in this action the plaintiff, a corporation, alleged that defendant made and delivered to it bis promissory note, dated March 25,1893, whereby he agreed to pay to its order the sum of $312 on November 1, 1893. Defendant in his answer alleged that in September, 1892, one Pohl executed his note to plaintiff, and secured it by a chattel mortgage on certain described personal property; that this note came due, and Pohl failed to pay the same, and thereafter “made and executed the note alleged in the complaint 'herein, and this defendant signed the same as surety”; and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Security Bank v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by12 opinions
- Security National Bank of Minneapolis v. PulverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Turle v. SargentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Bank of Montreal v. BeecherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Peterson v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Germania Bank v. MichaudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.