Legal Opinion
Brant v. Barnett
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1894No. 1,292PublishedCited by 9 opinions
From the Clinton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This action was brought by the appellant, Charles W. Brant, against the appellees, Margaret S. Barnett and Laura E. Burgett, on a promissory note dated October 20, 1893, calling for $92.85, and due one day after date. The appellees answered separately. After the issues were joined there was a trial by jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the appellees, upon which, after the court’s overruling a motion for a new trial filed by appellant, judgment was rendered in favor of appellees.
Counsel admit that the judgment as to the appellee, Margaret S. Barnett, is * right, hence we need not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moyer v. BrandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Starr v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Owens v. TagueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Stapp v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vanderburgh v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Suit v. HershmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Wipperman v. HardyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Simmons v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.