Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1988No. 162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to quash criminal charges alleging that the prosecution is barred on grounds of double jeopardy. The sole question presented is whether a consent agreement entered into by a husband and wife, pursuant to the Protection From Abuse Act, 1 creates a bar to criminal prosecution for the crimes alleged to have occurred out of the same conduct which brought about the consent agreement. We conclude that it does not.

This case arose out of a domestic dispute which occurred on March 15, 1987, between appellant, Eugene Smith, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Eichenlaub v. EichenlaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Clifton Myers A/K/A Samuel Jenkins, Clifton MyersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. Com. v. Gross, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Gross, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Commonwealth v. Moyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County2004
  5. Counterman v. Shoemaker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API