Legal Opinion
People v. Tumminello
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 26, 2016PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the judgments of conviction are affirmed.
Defendant was charged in separate accusatory instruments with assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]), criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]), and endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]), respectively. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of all charges.
On appeal, defendant contends that all three accusatory instruments were facially insufficient and that the evidence presented at trial was legally insufficient to support her convictions.
*37…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Jakubowski (Adam)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- People v. Utak (N'Tia)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019