Legal Opinion
Standard Life & Accident Ins. v. Carroll
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 11, 1898No. 8PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
The question for our determination is whether, under the special verdict, judgment should have been entered in favor of the plaintiff below in the sum of $1,600, with interest from the 1st day of July, 1896, or in the sum of $4,000, with interest from said date. The action was upon an accident insurance policy dated January 24, 1895, which provides as follows:
“The Standard Life and Accident Insurance Company of Detroit, Michigan, in consideration of the warranties in the application for this policy, and of twenty-four dollars, hereby insures John Carroll, of Titusville,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
3Cited by7 opinions
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. RositzkyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- McCarthy v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Central Business Men's Ass'n v. FaithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Beane v. Continental Casualty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1914
- National Acc. Soc. of New York v. DolphCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.