Legal Opinion

Gullo v. Hartford Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph D. Mintz, J.

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment on their declaratory judgment action, and defendant cross-moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The declaratory judgment action is limited to the application of the underinsured motorists provisions in the supplementary uninsured motorist rider to a policy of insurance issued by defendants which covered plaintiffs herein. The *331following facts are undisputed: Plaintiffs’ automobile was covered by a policy of insurance issued by defendant providing for liability coverage in the amount of $100,000/300,000.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maurizzio v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. United Community Insurance v. MucatelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Garry v. Worldwide Underwriters InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Automobile Insurance v. StillwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re the Arbitration between Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance & CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API