Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 15, 1855PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Act of 1852 to prevent traffic in intoxicating liquors. Indictment for offences against the act of 1852, to prevent traffic in intoxicating liquor for the purpose of drinking.

Read the full summary

Act of 1852 to prevent traffic in intoxicating liquors. Indictment for offences against the act of 1852, to prevent traffic in intoxicating liquor for the purpose of drinking. The indictment was found at the December Term, 1854, and contained one hundred and fifteen counts, all of which were substantially in the form prescribed for complaints in the eighteenth section of said act, (Laws of 1852, p. 26.) alleging the offences in the several counts at different times between the 25th of June and the 21st of December, 1854. Seventy-eight of the counts were for illegally selling intoxicating…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, Ch. J.

This is an indictment for violations of the liquor law of 1852. It was held by this court, in the State v. Parker, and we think correctly, that under one complaint the prosecutor might show any number of offences, being bound, if required, to give the respondent before trial, a specification of the nature of the offences, which he would attempt to prove. 1 do not recollect that the point was taken in that case, that this provision only extended to justice’s courts. But it seems to us that it was clearly the intention of the act to…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. CameronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  4. State v. BevinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
  5. People v. SicklesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API