Hodsdon v. Mid-Continental, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Was the contract for purchase and sale of described realty in the instant case lacking in specificity to the extent that the purchaser-plaintiff was entitled to a refund of his earnest payment? The trial judge ruled in the negative. We agree with this decision holding the document to be sufficiently definite in every respect.
Seriatim, we present and simultaneously deal with each of appellant’s assertions:(1) The contract contains no description of the property to be conveyed as security for the balance of the purchase price.
Our View: The tract to be conveyed is stated to be 53.35…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- IDEAL REALTY COMPANY v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Chewning v. BrandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Branan & Schmitz Realty, Inc. v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldberg v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983