Legal Opinion

Pfeifer v. Smith

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1883Published

Appellant, Pfeifer, filed bis bill in the Chancery Court of Lincoln county against appellees, who were legatees under the last will and testament of Bartlett Smith, deceased, in which he seeks to subject lands devised to defendants to the payment of a debt to him contracted with him by the executor of Smith’s will after the death of the testator. The will was made an exhibit to the bill.

Read the full summary

Appellant, Pfeifer, filed bis bill in the Chancery Court of Lincoln county against appellees, who were legatees under the last will and testament of Bartlett Smith, deceased, in which he seeks to subject lands devised to defendants to the payment of a debt to him contracted with him by the executor of Smith’s will after the death of the testator. The will was made an exhibit to the bill. It appears from the will that the testator devised all his property, real and personal, to his children, defendants, giving them the title on his death. It further provided that the property. devised should…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion.

2Per curiam

This case we must regard as settled by the adjudication in Hogan v. Barksdale, 44 Miss. 186; and Ward v. Harrington, 24 Miss. 238.

Affirmed.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hagan v. BarksdaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API