Legal Opinion

Whitwell v. Continental Tobacco Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1903No. 1,902PublishedCited by 42 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by the plaintiff, Joseph P. Whitwell, to recover treble damages from'the Continental. Tobacco Company, a corporation, and from one of its employés, George E. McHie, under the anti-trust act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200], on the sole ground that the defendants refused to sell the manufactured products of the tobacco company to him at prices which would enable him to resell them to others at a profit, unless he refrained from buying, selling, or hand*456ling plug chewing tobacco made by independent manufacturers who…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  5. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  5. Brosious v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API