Legal Opinion

Burnham Chemical Co. v. Krug

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 28, 1949No. Civil Action No. 1579-47PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

This is an action against the Secretary of the Interior, to require him to grant the plaintiff’s application for a prospecting permit on certain lands located in what is known as the Kramer Borax District in the State of California.

The application was presented to the Department of the Interior on June 1, 1928. It sought a prospecting permit for sodium borates in the lands involved in this action. The application was presented pursuant to the provisions of Section 23 of the Act of *912February 25, 1920, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, U.S.C.A., Title 30, § 261.1 When…

2Cited by6 opinions

Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
Cheney v. East Texas Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
Nequoia Ass'n v. Department of the Interior of the United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1985
Burnham Chemical Company, a Corporation v. Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
United States v. HeatonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.