Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Earhart

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1994PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

This case presents for review the decision of the Court, of Appeals, reversing a judgment for the wrongful death of the plaintiffs’ decedent. The Court of Appeals found that the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (1988) (hereafter referred to as “manual”) was not applicable in this case. This Court reaches the same conclusion and affirms the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The record shows that the defendant, Everett Earhart, had purchased from a construction company and a private landowner *834the timber on certain tracts of land…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lock v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nidiffer v. Clinchfield RailroadCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Johnson v. Oman Construction Company, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Carman v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Evelyn Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  3. THURSTON HENSLEY v. CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  4. Hughes v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. Scott v. Jones Bros. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API