Legal Opinion
People v. Apostle
New York County Courts
Decided April 27, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert E. Henion, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment [Oet. 13, 1960] of the Court of Special Sessions of the Town of Clarkstown [Johh A. Steeax, J.] convicting bim of advertising without a permit in violation of rule 13 of the Rules and Regulations of the Palisades Interstate Park Commission.
The rule in question reads as follows: ‘ ‘ 13. Advertising prohibited. No person shall, without a permit from the commission, post, paint, affix, distribute, hand out, deliver, place, cast or leave about, any bill, billboard, placard, ticket, handbill, circular or advertisement; display any flag, banner, transparency,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Stubbe v. . AdamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Citadel Management Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
- People v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. ParryAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1975
- Wellens v. Palisades Interstate Park CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1961