Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Girouard

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 14, 2011No. 10-0642/ARPublished

1DissentBaker, Judge

I dissent for two reasons. First, consistent with my views in United States v. Jones, 68 M.J. 465, 475 (C.A.A.F.2010) (Baker, J., dissenting), negligent homicide is a lesser included offense (LIO) of murder. Second, although I agree with the majority that a person may not be convicted of a crime for which he has not been charged, the majority fails to explain why it is appropriate to test for prejudice in light of Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 201. R.C.M. 201(b)(3) plainly states that unless an offense is properly referred to a court-martial the court-martial is without jurisdiction to try…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API