Legal Opinion

Middleton v. Broussard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1974No. B-4124PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Louis M. Broussard and others instituted this suit to obtain a judgment construing a deed and declaring what royalty was conveyed by the Broussards’ deed to R. M. Middleton. Plaintiffs are the successors in title of the original grantors, and the defendants, Triphene Middleton and others, are the successors in title of the original grantee, R. M. Middleton. The Broussards executed and delivered the deed in question to Middleton on November 4, 1940. The trial court agreed with the construction of the deed urged by the Middletons and construed the deed as a conveyance of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Benge v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. King v. First National Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hooks v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Newsom v. NewsomTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. McElmurray v. McElmurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. First National Bank in Dallas v. KinabrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Averyt v. Grande, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Stewman Ranch, Inc. v. Double M. Ranch, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
  4. Moon Royalty, LLC v. Boldrick Partners, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  5. Maurice C. Hunsaker v. Brown Distributing Company Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API