Legal Opinion
Hadar v. Pierce
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 2013PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered January 9, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants Clay Pierce and Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP’s motion to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed as against those defendants. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
The first through fourth causes of action are based on the purportedly false statements made in the complaint in a prior Supreme Court action and the petition in a Surrogate’s Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Fletcher v. Dakota, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Vanship Holdings Limited v. Energy Infrastructure Acquisition Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Vigoda v. DCA Productions Plus Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Feng Li v. ShihAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022