Legal Opinion

Erwen v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM ST. LOUIS CRIMINAL COURT.

1Opinion of the CourtRyland, J.

The defendant was indicted for grand larceny, by the grand jury of Sfc. Louis county, was tried and convicted. He thereupon made his motion in arrest of judgment, assigning as the reason in support of the motion, the insufficiency of the indictment in this, that there is no time alleged when the felony was committed. Upon looking into the record of the proceedings of the Criminal Court, I find that the indictment w'holly omits to allege any time at which the offense was committed.

*217This is a fatal error ; for which the court below should have sustained the motion in arrest. It is thought…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Battel v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Shultz v. SutterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API