Bernard Schoninger Shopping Centers, Ltd. v. J.P.S. Elastomerics, Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
The controversy in this diversity suit stems from a leaky roof. The owner of the porous building seeks money damages against the installer of the roof under several legal theories. The district court held the owner’s claims barred on the ground that the applicable statute of limitations had run. The district court entered summary judgment for the installer, and the owner appeals. We affirm.
I
Bernard Schoninger Shopping Centers, Ltd., the appellant, is a limited partnership organized under the laws of Florida. 1 Schoninger owns and manages ten shopping centers, one of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelley v. School Bd. of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Hutcherson v. Progressive Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Duke v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Bd. of Trustees v. Caudill Rowlett ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- ALMAND CONST. CO., INC. v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Donald E. Carlson v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Ferrell v. River City Roofing, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Lesti v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Garrish v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Garrish v. International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.