Native Village of Quinhagak v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
These appeals involve an award of attorneys’ fees resulting from more than a decade of litigation over subsistence fishing rights in Alaskan waters. Defendanb-Ap-pellant/Cross-Appellee State of Alaska argues that the plaintiff villages were not entitled to recover fees on the issue of which government — -federal or state— could assert jurisdiction to manage subsistence fishing. Plaintiffs-Appellees cross-appeal, arguing that they were entitled not only to the fees awarded, but also to fees incurred during required administrative proceedings.
We have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nancy Lee Ferland v. Conrad Credit Corp., a California Corporation Gregg A. michel,ph.d., an Individual Does 1-20, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western Watersheds Project v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Native Village Of Quinhagak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Day v. James Marine IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Day v. James Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Day v. James Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008