Legal Opinion

Native Village of Quinhagak v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 8, 2002No. Nos. 01-35430, 01-35466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

These appeals involve an award of attorneys’ fees resulting from more than a decade of litigation over subsistence fishing rights in Alaskan waters. Defendanb-Ap-pellant/Cross-Appellee State of Alaska argues that the plaintiff villages were not entitled to recover fees on the issue of which government — -federal or state— could assert jurisdiction to manage subsistence fishing. Plaintiffs-Appellees cross-appeal, arguing that they were entitled not only to the fees awarded, but also to fees incurred during required administrative proceedings.

We have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Nancy Lee Ferland v. Conrad Credit Corp., a California Corporation Gregg A. michel,ph.d., an Individual Does 1-20, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Watersheds Project v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Native Village Of Quinhagak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Day v. James Marine IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Day v. James Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Day v. James Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API