Legal Opinion

State v. Flood

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 4, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

30 N.J. Super. 196 (1954)

104 A.2d 90

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

JOHN J. FLOOD, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County Court, Law Division.

Decided March 4, 1954.

Mr. Leon Gerofsky, Prosecutor of Pleas, attorney for the State of New Jersey.

Mr. Seymour Weinblatt, attorney for defendant.

CRANMER, J.C.C.

Application for writ of habeas corpus was referred to this court by the assignment judge and writ was issued. Counsel was assigned and prosecuted the application in a vigorous and commendable manner. The application is very meager, merely stating that the defendant was not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CynkowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. State v. ByraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  3. State v. FriedmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. State v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  5. State v. MulvaneyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GreeneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. In Re GarofoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. State v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. State v. FloodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API