Legal Opinion

Tausik v. Tausik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum by the Court. • Determination of Appellate Term, dated April 4,1960 and April 5,1960, affirmed, with costs to respondent. Subdivision 8 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act, which was enacted following a recommendation by the Law Revision Commission (1951 Report of N. Y. Law Rev. Comm,. [N. Y. Legis. Doc., 1951, No. 65(C)]) provides for summary proceedings against a licensee whose license has expired or has been revoked by the licensor. Nothing in subdivision 8 of section 1411 limits the term ‘ ‘ licensee ” so as to exclude a spouse. Before the enactment of subdivision 8, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wood v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drost v. HookeyNew York District Court · 2009
  2. Piotrowski v. LittleMiddletown City Court · 2010
  3. Golfinopoulos v. GolfinopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Heckman v. HeckmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  5. Heckman v. HeckmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API