Legal Opinion

Bour v. Kimball

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 11, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. S. P. McConnell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

This is an action by the appellant upon a proposal accepted by them, and which they on then-part performed, so far as at present appears, as follows:

“ Illinois Central E. E. Advertising [

Department of Suburban Coaches- [

Chicago, June 1, 1891.

To Bour & Co., 59 Dearborn St., Chicago, 111.:

You are hereby authorized and directed to place my card, as per copy, to occupy one panel or space for the term of twelve months, in 100 suburban passenger coaches of the Illinois Central Eailroad Company.

In consideration thereof, I hereby agree to pay to the order of Bour & Co. the sum of fifty dollars ($50)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. House v. WilderIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Alcuin Montessori SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. McCann v. Frank B. Hall & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. CordsiemonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  4. City of Buffalo v. Strong & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Dunlap v. Alcuin Montessori SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API