Legal Opinion

Lifesphere v. Sahnd

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2008No. C-080241PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jack Sahnd appeals the entry of summary judgment for plaintiff-appellee, Lifesphere, on its claim that Jack’s mother, Kathleen, had fraudulently transferred her home to Jack under R.C. 1336.04. We affirm.

{¶ 2} Kathleen was 80 plus when, in January 2005, she gave her house to her son Jack Sahnd. About seven months later, Kathleen moved to Maple Knoll, a geriatric-care nursing home operated by Lifesphere, and she lived there until she died in January 2006.

{¶ 3} Under Ohio Adm.Code 5101:1-39-07, certain transfers of resources are deemed improper…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Blood v. NofzingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BoswellOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Brown Bark II, L.P. v. CoakleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. In re Estate of GreerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Liberty Nursing Ctr. of Englewood, Inc. v. ValentineOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. St. Clairsville Pointe, Inc. v. MusilliOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API