Legal Opinion

Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. v. Kvaerner

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

*409This case presents a question on which, surprisingly, there is a dearth of New York law: whether a party to a New York action is obligated to produce documents of its subsidiaries located outside the United States pursuant to the CPLR Plaintiff The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch (Bank of Tokyo) asserts that defendant, Kvaerner a.s., should be required to respond to discovery demands to produce documents from its wholly owned foreign subsidiaries; Kvaerner, on the other hand, maintains that the requested documents are discoverable only…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Orlich v. Helm Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In re the Estate of AgustaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Intercontinental Credit Corp. Division of Pan American Trade Development Corp. v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1991
  4. BAII Banking Corp. v. Northville Industries Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Scarminach v. Goldwell GmbHNew York Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Genger v. GengerNew York Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API