Legal Opinion

Municipality No. Three v. Michoud

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 15, 1851PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Buchanan, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court (Slidell, J., dissenting,) was pronounced by

Rost, J.

In the case of the plaintiffs against the Ursuline Nuns, 2d Ann. 611, we refused to give judgment against the defendants, for a tax on real property not laid out into streets, which had freen assessed at the same rate as *606tlie tax on tho other real property of the municipality; but we reserved the rights of the corporation to recover the tax, upon previously making a deduction on the assessment, as contemplated by the proviso of the 6th section of the act of 1805, incorporating the city of New Orleans.

The plaintiffs…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Porterie v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Holton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  3. Lacoste v. Department of ConservationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  5. Bethlehem Supply Co. v. Pan-Southern Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API