Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 22, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

36 N.J. 487 (1962)

178 A.2d 161

RUTH DWYER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 24, 1961.

Decided January 22, 1962.

Mr. Aaron Gordon argued the cause for petitioner-appellant (Mr. Louis L. Cronson, on the brief; Messrs. Hirschberg, Nashel, Zorn & Cronson, attorneys).

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for respondent-respondent (Mr. Andrew S. Polito, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

This is a heart death workmen's compensation case. The Division of Workmen's Compensation denied an award;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Stanley Co. of America v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Central Electric Power Ass'n v. HicksMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Joseph v. Passaic Hospital Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Russo v. TEACHERS'PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Meines v. Hy Levine AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. Renner v. R. L. Tool & Die Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API