Csatlos v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.

There have been two trials. On the first appeal there was a reversal (75 N. Y. Supp. 5S3), on the ground that there were errors in the charge; and it was intimated in the opinion, also, that the evidence did not warrant a recovery for negligence in the operation of the car, but, if at all, for negligence in failing to furnish an efficient brake. On the second appeal (79 N. Y. Supp. 653) the judgment was reversed, on the ground that there was a mistrial; this court upon the evidence finding it impossible to determine whether the defendant’s liability was predicated on negligent operation of…