Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fowle v. . Ham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 11, 1918Published

ActioN to restrain the cutting of timber and to recover damages, heard by Gonnor, J., at May Term, 1918, of Beaueort. The Court denied a restraining order, and plaintiffs appealed.

1ConcurrenceHoke, J.

I cannot assent to the position that the laws of North Carolina controlling the question either make or were intended to make the indexing an essential part of a valid registration. The cases in other States which so hold were on the interpretation of statutes having substantially different wording from ours, and I am of opinion that the case of Davies v. Whitaker, 114 N. C., 279, was well decided. True, the books in many of the counties have become 'so numerous that with*14■out an index tbe value of our registration laws, as an assurance of title, has been greatly impaired; but if a change is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Hill v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Center School Township v. State ex rel. Board of School CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Storrie v. CortesTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Falconer v. SimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API